All research
SystemsActive research

Closing the simulation-to-execution gap.

Testing what survives a change in simulator, operating conditions, and inference runtime.

IsaacLabMuJoCoONNX

The question

Which policy behaviors are robust, and which depend on assumptions hidden in the simulator or runtime?

The approach

Use IsaacLab with an independent MuJoCo validation path. Test domain randomization and perturbations, then maintain observation and action parity from training through exported ONNX inference to the control loop.

Validation focus

  • Vary contact, friction, noise, inertia, latency, and actuator response.
  • Check observation preprocessing, action scaling, and control frequency.
  • Trace commanded actions against measured responses to distinguish model and integration errors.

Current boundary

Simulator parity and deployment consistency are research objectives under evaluation. Cross-simulator checks are not a substitute for physical validation.

Start a conversation

Bring us a hard
learning problem.

Discuss a research collaboration, explore a training pipeline, or request a walkthrough of our work.

Discuss your project